The article states: “As a recent USA Today editorial pointed out, those who reject the proposed deal are living in a fantasy land. These opponents contend if the proposed deal fails the talks will just re-start and lead to a better deal while the international coalition and its coordinated sanctions can be maintained. Both of these conclusions are baseless and deeply flawed. They also ignore the inevitable consequence that Iran would then be free to pursue development of nuclear weapons.”
“These vital considerations are foremost in the minds of the many Israeli security, military and nuclear Israelis who support the proposed deal. Two particular voices stand out: the former head of the Mossad, Efraim Halevy, who wrote that under the pact Iran is “forced to agree to an invasive and unique monitoring regime, which is unparalleled around the world …” and the former head of the Shin Bet, Ami Ayalon, who said that “when it comes to Iran’s nuclear capability, this [deal] is the best option …” Their opinions are based on hard facts, not political posturing, and carefully weighed consequences.”
http://peacenow.org/entry.php?id=13906#.VeMXy7QV78E
http://nec-se.webbar312.net/2015/08/12/11-aug-15-interview-of-ltc-sargis-sangari-on-josh-bernstein-show-about-the-iranian-nuclear-deal/
